Any cool spiritual material...

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 12:42 am

i find your post interesting. Because you believe religion is primarily negative, I think you said responsible for wars.......

lol..........well i'm not getting into an arguement but i did NOT say it was primarily negative...........i said it was responsible for a lot of wars.....but i did not say it was negative..........i'm interested that you thought that.....

and yes i did have a weird experience when i saw the Dalai Lama IN PERSON.................i did not expect it........it spooked me ........the sort of reaction you can't anticipate, you have to be there in person.........

fluffy

quirky · Post by **quirky** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:32 am

Clemmy wrote:
quirky wrote: It seems to be the representatives on Earth who create the conflict.
You said it. This is the core of the conflicts ... the interpretation of each and every person about religion, politics, and the world at-large... and some people wanting to gain control over others.

I know....my strong sensation lately is that God is just wanting everyone to worship. To be kind to each other. To understand poverty and even criminality. Jesus hung around with Mary Magdalen....

Which says to me, that he was in the poorer neighborhoods, seeking imperfect people.

There's no reason members of any particular religion...if they have a calling...can't work to change things.

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:47 am

I know....my strong sensation lately is that God is just wanting everyone to worship. To be kind to each other. To understand poverty and even criminality.

God and worshipping aside we should all be kind and try to understand each other...........we don't need an organised religion to give us permission.........lol......
perhaps i'm more of a pagan.......lol......
i believe in nature and love.......

peace and love folks.......lol

fluffy

[/quote]

quirky · Post by **quirky** » Tue May 16, 2006 2:30 am

we should all be kind and try to understand each other.

But most people don't...I mean....you stated the obvious here, but people today are closed off...for the most part.

I love who I love (with the exception of some people, of course). I'm always friendly and I hope others can sense and realize that. I'm not about bullshit.....we need to be genuine to make things change.

Today my friend needed me to drive him to the food pantry at Sacred Heart Church. It was quite an experience.

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 2:42 am

i mean 'love' in the broadest sense of the word..........not just love for family, friends and partners etc..........but a love and respect for creation and life........and that expands to respect and compassion for fellow human beings.........

fluffy

mav · Post by **mav** » Tue May 16, 2006 3:00 am

fluffy wrote:i mean 'love' in the broadest sense of the word..........not just love for family, friends and partners etc..........but a love and respect for creation and life........and that expands to respect and compassion for fellow human beings.........

fluffy

Since you mentioned it, do you respect peoples right to privacy, fluffy ?

-

quirky · Post by **quirky** » Tue May 16, 2006 3:46 am

I love Mav....I hope she can feel it....I send it out strong.

mav · Post by **mav** » Tue May 16, 2006 4:09 am

Ooh, I was wondering why my right eyelid was twitching

Thanks, I need it

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm

Since you mentioned it, do you respect peoples right to privacy, fluffy

...........

of course i do...........lol..........and if you go back to the tabloid arguement my point was that we live in a tabloid society......
however......i live in Britain.........we invented tabloidism.........so it is possible that my perspective is different.........
and of course Jim is entitled to privacy..........Everybody is.............

lol........by the way...'hey Quirky, did he exit the dang fortress for you??.....lol....did you get that new pic you want??...........lol......

.........ok ok...........Truce........lol

fluffy

quirky · Post by **quirky** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:29 pm

Excuse me? I think you were talking to Mav.

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:33 pm

....................lol.................hows Peeps??.........

fluffy

mav · Post by **mav** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:39 pm

fluffy wrote:
however......i live in Britain.........we invented tabloidism.........so it is possible that my perspective is different.........
and of course Jim is entitled to privacy..........Everybody is.............

You want ALL rumor about Jim but you respect his privacy. See, you contradict yourself.

-

mav · Post by **mav** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:52 pm

fluffy wrote:lol..........and if you go back to the tabloid arguement my point was that we live in a tabloid society......

Things can be changed for the better. Would you like to change it ?

-

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 1:57 pm

You want ALL rumor about Jim but you respect his privacy. See, you contradict yourself

.........where do i say that??......nope........you are mistaken ............

Things can be changed for the better. Would you like to change it

.........i am not being drawn into this...........but you seem to think you are taking a moral high ground..........don't you have freedom of speech in the constitution??

fluffy

fluffy · Post by **fluffy** » Tue May 16, 2006 2:04 pm

i

think some tabloid is unavoidable...........we're saturated by the media ........i guess we just need to take a responsible, middle of the road approach..........people will read the stuff in the tabloids anyhow............and giving people a chance to discuss it here will enable us to dispell any rumours..............such as Jim's Cameo as Evans lover in Evan Almighty ...(where on earth did that one come from.....lol)
it's NOT TRUE........lol.......
anyway............i just say.......keep and open mind and be sensible.....

i think you'll find this is what i actually said............i call for people to have an open mind and be sensible..............i DO NOT say we should waver Jims right to privacy..................nor do i expect to be scapegoated ..............

fluffy