Jim in Garfield the Movie!?!?

cotton · Post by **cotton** » Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:15 pm

I just read in a magazine that Jim was supposed to play John in Garfield the movie but he turned it down (obviously). Good move Jim cause that movie stunk!

Cheryl Anna · Post by **Cheryl Anna** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:36 am

It would have been a better movie if Jim Carrey was in it.

Edward Nygma · Post by **Edward Nygma** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:29 pm

I believe that if Jim had been in it they would have had to write a better script coz the script stunk indeedy!
The actor in the film is soooooooooooooooo bad, just terrible!
I don't think they had enough money to pay Jim anyway, it seems that they spent all the money on Garfield and didn't make the tiniest effort to find a good script or a good story...for shame.

thecablegal · Post by **thecablegal** » Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:54 pm

I watched it with my 9 month old nephew, and he seemed to be the only one who enjoyed it, it was utter pants!

neutro · Post by **neutro** » Sat Oct 23, 2004 9:21 pm

they shouldn't have even taken a stab at garfield with such a silly concept of cgi/reallife mix. though with Jim it could have been a lot better of a movie.