Page 1 of 1

Jim in Garfield the Movie!?!?

Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:15 pm
by cotton
I just read in a magazine that Jim was supposed to play John in Garfield the movie but he turned it down (obviously). Good move Jim cause that movie stunk!

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:36 am
by Cheryl Anna
It would have been a better movie if Jim Carrey was in it.

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:29 pm
by Edward Nygma
I believe that if Jim had been in it they would have had to write a better script coz the script stunk indeedy!
The actor in the film is soooooooooooooooo bad, just terrible!
I don't think they had enough money to pay Jim anyway, it seems that they spent all the money on Garfield and didn't make the tiniest effort to find a good script or a good story...for shame. :(

Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 6:54 pm
by thecablegal
I watched it with my 9 month old nephew, and he seemed to be the only one who enjoyed it, it was utter pants!

Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 9:21 pm
by neutro
they shouldn't have even taken a stab at garfield with such a silly concept of cgi/reallife mix. though with Jim it could have been a lot better of a movie. :o